The Best Businesses Often Begin With Something Broken

The next billion-dollar company may not begin with a brilliant idea.

It may begin with someone asking:

“Why the hell does this still work like this?”

That question is more powerful than it sounds.

Because some of the biggest opportunities in business don't come from creating entirely new behavior.

They come from finding an existing system that people already depend on—and discovering that the system is inefficient, expensive, fragmented, slow, unreliable, or simply outdated.

Then fixing it.

Broken doesn't always look broken

This is where entrepreneurship gets interesting.

If something completely stops working, everyone notices.

A bank's systems go down.

A power plant fails.

A payment network crashes.

A factory stops producing.

A website disappears.

Those are obvious failures.

But some of the most valuable opportunities exist in systems that technically work.

They just work badly.

A company can still process orders through spreadsheets.

A customer can still make a payment by visiting a branch.

A manager can still coordinate twenty employees through WhatsApp.

A manufacturer can still use phone calls to track suppliers.

An artist can still guess which city to tour.

Everything functions.

Just inefficiently.

And because it has functioned that way for years, everyone has stopped questioning it.

The "normal" trap

One of the biggest obstacles to innovation is the word:

normal.

People say:

"That's just how the industry works."

That sentence should make an entrepreneur curious.

Because "normal" often means:

nobody has successfully changed it yet.

It doesn't mean the system is optimal.

Consider how many industries once considered these things normal:

waiting several days for a bank transfer,

calling a taxi company,

booking travel through an agent,

buying music physically,

renting movies from a store,

printing boarding passes,

visiting a branch to perform basic banking.

Then someone changed the system.

What looked like a normal process suddenly looked ridiculous.

Broken systems create economic leakage

A useful way to identify opportunity is to ask:

Where is money leaking out of the system?

Imagine a company makes $10 million in sales.

But because of poor logistics, it loses:

$300,000 to damaged inventory,

$200,000 to unnecessary storage,

$150,000 to inefficient routing,

$100,000 to administrative errors.

The business isn't necessarily failing.

But hundreds of thousands of dollars are disappearing through friction.

A company that can remove that friction may create significant value.

Every inefficient system has a cost

The cost doesn't always appear as a direct invoice.

It can appear as:

time,

wasted labor,

lost customers,

excess inventory,

delays,

mistakes,

missed opportunities,

unused capacity,

stress,

or uncertainty.

This is why entrepreneurs should learn to think in terms of economic consequences.

If a process wastes 20 hours every week, what is that time worth?

If a system causes 5% of customers to abandon a purchase, what is that revenue worth?

If unreliable electricity forces a factory to use generators, what does that additional energy actually cost?

The problem becomes much more interesting when you put a number beside it.

Sometimes the workaround is the real business opportunity

Imagine a company has a problem.

Instead of buying software, it creates a spreadsheet.

Then another spreadsheet.

Then a WhatsApp group.

Then a shared Google Drive.

Then an employee whose entire job is to reconcile everything.

Now you have something fascinating.

The company has effectively built its own software system.

It just doesn't call it software.

This is one of the strongest signals an entrepreneur can find.

When customers build complicated workarounds, they may be telling you exactly what product they need.

Look for "human middleware"

There's another version of this.

Sometimes an industry has no proper system, so humans become the infrastructure.

Someone manually checks documents.

Someone calls customers.

Someone copies data.

Someone confirms payments.

Someone matches buyers and sellers.

Someone follows up with suppliers.

Someone translates information between systems.

Someone maintains a spreadsheet.

Someone sends reminders.

Someone resolves errors.

These people may be performing essential work.

But the underlying process may be badly designed.

That creates an opportunity for better systems.

The opportunity isn't always software

This is important.

Entrepreneurs sometimes see every problem and immediately think:

"I'll build an app."

But software is only one possible solution.

Sometimes the answer is:

better infrastructure,

better financing,

better logistics,

better training,

better distribution,

better manufacturing,

better physical facilities,

or simply a better operating model.

A broken system doesn't necessarily need another dashboard.

Sometimes it needs a road.

Infrastructure is often the hidden problem

Imagine farmers produce enough food.

Customers want the food.

But there isn't sufficient:

storage,

cold-chain infrastructure,

transportation,

processing capacity,

or reliable electricity.

The problem isn't demand.

The problem is infrastructure.

Now imagine someone builds the missing infrastructure.

They aren't necessarily creating demand.

They're unlocking demand that already exists.

That can be an extremely powerful business model.

Find the constraint

Every system has constraints.

A factory may have enough orders but insufficient power.

A hospital may have doctors but insufficient equipment.

A city may have housing demand but insufficient land development.

A company may have customers but insufficient logistics.

An artist may have followers but insufficient knowledge of where real demand exists.

A country may have natural resources but insufficient processing capacity.

The constraint is often where the opportunity lives.

The bottleneck can be worth more than the product

Imagine a pipeline transporting something extremely valuable.

The commodity gets all the attention.

But the pipeline may quietly collect fees from the movement of that commodity.

Or consider a data center.

Everyone talks about AI models.

But the infrastructure providing the:

compute,

power,

cooling,

storage,

and connectivity

may become strategically important.

The lesson is:

Don't only study what everyone is excited about. Study what the exciting thing depends on.

Follow the dependency chain

Suppose everyone believes AI is going to grow rapidly.

Most people ask:

Which AI company will win?

A more interesting entrepreneur asks:

What does AI depend on?

Compute.

Chips.

Data centers.

Electricity.

Cooling.

Fiber.

Networking.

Cloud infrastructure.

Specialized talent.

Financing.

Now the opportunity map becomes much larger.

The visible product is only one layer.

Underneath it is an entire economic system.

Broken systems become more valuable when demand accelerates

A small bottleneck might not matter when demand is low.

But when demand increases rapidly, the bottleneck becomes expensive.

Imagine a road handling 10,000 vehicles a day.

Fine.

Now imagine the surrounding population doubles.

Traffic explodes.

The road becomes a constraint.

The underlying infrastructure didn't suddenly become worse.

Demand changed the economics of the bottleneck.

This happens constantly across industries.

This is why timing matters

A problem can exist for decades without producing a massive business opportunity.

Then something changes.

Technology gets cheaper.

Consumer behavior shifts.

Regulation changes.

Population increases.

Income rises.

A new industry appears.

Infrastructure improves.

Capital becomes available.

Suddenly the old problem becomes commercially solvable.

The problem wasn't necessarily new.

The conditions around it changed.

Uber didn't invent transportation

People already needed taxis.

The problem was the experience:

finding a vehicle,

knowing when it would arrive,

knowing what it would cost,

paying,

and coordinating the trip.

The underlying demand already existed.

Technology changed the economics of serving it.

That distinction matters.

Some of the biggest companies don't create entirely new needs.

They reorganize existing needs around a better system.

Airbnb didn't invent accommodation

People already needed somewhere to stay.

Hotels already existed.

The opportunity came from organizing previously underutilized accommodation into a new marketplace.

Again:

existing need + broken/inefficient system + new mechanism.

That pattern appears repeatedly in entrepreneurship.

Stripe didn't invent payments

Businesses already needed to accept payments.

But integrating payments into software was historically complicated.

The opportunity wasn't:

"People need to pay."

Everyone knew that.

The opportunity was:

"The infrastructure for accepting payments online is unnecessarily difficult."

Solve the infrastructure.

Capture the value.

Sometimes the broken thing is information

This is particularly interesting.

Markets often become inefficient because people don't have the right information at the right time.

A buyer doesn't know where supply exists.

A seller doesn't know where demand exists.

An investor doesn't know which companies are emerging.

A company doesn't know which customers are serious.

A manufacturer doesn't know which supplier can actually deliver.

An artist doesn't know which city contains concentrated demand.

The underlying market exists.

The missing layer is information.

Information can become infrastructure

Once enough economic activity depends on information, the information layer itself can become valuable.

Search engines did this.

Marketplaces do it.

Financial information platforms do it.

Credit systems do it.

Professional networks do it.

Discovery platforms do it.

The business isn't necessarily producing the underlying asset.

It is making the asset legible.

That can be incredibly powerful.

The best systems reduce uncertainty

Think about what businesses are really buying.

Sometimes they're buying software.

But underneath the software, they're buying:

certainty,

speed,

visibility,

control,

coordination,

prediction,

or access.

A logistics platform doesn't merely provide maps.

It provides better control over movement.

An accounting system doesn't merely store numbers.

It provides financial visibility.

A marketplace doesn't merely display products.

It reduces the uncertainty of finding a buyer or seller.

The product is often the mechanism.

The economic value is the uncertainty removed.

What is broken around you?

This is a better entrepreneurial exercise than brainstorming startup ideas.

Look at your city.

Your industry.

Your workplace.

Your neighborhood.

Your government.

Your supply chain.

Your daily routines.

Then write down everything that requires:

three phone calls,

a spreadsheet,

a middleman,

a physical trip,

a WhatsApp group,

a long waiting period,

manual verification,

repeated data entry,

or someone "who knows someone."

Those are clues.

Not every clue becomes a business.

But every successful business begins with some form of economic friction.

The founder's advantage is seeing friction before everyone else

Two people can experience the same broken system.

One says:

"This is annoying."

The other says:

"Why does this have to be this way?"

That second question is entrepreneurial.

Then comes the harder question:

"How much does this problem cost?"

Then:

"Who is willing to pay to remove it?"

Then:

"Can the solution work without me personally doing the work?"

Now you're moving from observation toward a business.

Don't just fix the symptom

A weak entrepreneur sees a problem and creates a patch.

A stronger entrepreneur asks:

Why does this problem exist in the first place?

Suppose deliveries are late.

You could hire more drivers.

Or perhaps the routing system is broken.

Suppose employees keep making mistakes.

You could hire more managers.

Or perhaps the workflow is poorly designed.

Suppose customers keep asking the same questions.

You could hire more support agents.

Or perhaps the product isn't communicating clearly.

The best solution often removes the cause rather than managing the symptom.

Build the system, not the workaround

This is the distinction between a service and a scalable business.

A service might solve the problem manually.

A system makes the solution repeatable.

One customer.

Then ten.

Then one hundred.

Then one thousand.

The entrepreneur gradually moves from:

doing the work

to

building the machine that does the work.

That's where leverage begins.

Broken systems can become enormous businesses

The opportunity gets particularly interesting when the broken system has:

many users

high frequency

high economic cost

poor existing alternatives

strong willingness to pay

room for a dramatically better solution.

Now you aren't just fixing something annoying.

You're potentially rebuilding a piece of an industry.

The biggest clue may be dependence

Here's the question I would ask before building almost anything:

If this problem disappeared tomorrow, would people notice?

If the answer is no, the problem may not matter enough.

But if removing the problem would cause customers to:

save money,

make money,

move faster,

reduce risk,

serve more customers,

or operate more reliably,

then you may have something.

And if they would be genuinely angry if your solution disappeared?

That's even more interesting.

Because you've moved beyond convenience.

You've created dependence.

From broken system to business

The pattern often looks like this:

Something is broken

↓

People create workarounds

↓

The workarounds become expensive

↓

Someone notices the pattern

↓

They understand the underlying problem

↓

They build a better mechanism

↓

Customers adopt it

↓

The mechanism becomes part of the workflow

↓

Customers begin depending on it

↓

The solution becomes infrastructure

That's the trajectory entrepreneurs should be looking for.

The real opportunity

The most interesting business opportunities aren't always hiding in futuristic technology.

Sometimes they're sitting inside:

the spreadsheet,

the queue,

the WhatsApp group,

the manual approval,

the unreliable generator,

the expensive middleman,

the disconnected database,

the outdated workflow,

the unused capacity,

or the information nobody has organized properly.

Everyone else sees inconvenience.

The entrepreneur sees unpriced economic friction.

And once you learn to see broken systems that way, you stop asking:

"What startup should I build?"

You start asking:

"What important system is inefficient enough that someone could build a much better one?"

That is a much more interesting question.

Next on Omniv: